If speed without any sacrifice in quality means anything to you, though, FCPX is your best bet. If control is your ultimate goal, choose something else, like Premiere. Other NLEs have since copied many of them. Then they added all the features pros wanted over the next 2 years, and not only did they add them, they RE-IMAGINED them to work better and faster. In the early days, editors scorned FCPX because it wasn't fully-featured. It does so much for you in the background, and, typical Apple, they've removed unnecessary options by doing them for you automatically, and exclusing ones that are irrelevant. Most don't really matter to what you're doing. I quickly noticed a 40% speed increase over track-based editors where everything you want to do is a deep dive down a rabbithole of sliders and checkboxes and dials. One month after switching from a track-based workflow to FCPX, I was shocked to find myself going home on-time for a change. But they really need to power through the paradigm shift to reach the point where the speed is really felt. Those who have edited in track-based software for years and years will find this jarring. The less you know about editing, the easier to learn this software is. Blu-ray recorder required for burning Blu-ray discs.įastest NLE on the market, without sacrificing any quality Some features require Internet access fees may apply. System Requirements: macOS 12.6 or later, 4GB of RAM (8GB recommended for 4K editing, 3D titles, and 360° video editing), Metal-capable graphics card, 1GB of VRAM recommended for 4K editing, 3D titles, and 360° video editing, 5.5GB of available disk space.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |